Friday, 20 April 2012

Vivienne And Dido's Lament - a soprano duet

  
Vivienne Agnes Bennett, aged 18 years in 1911.
 
My latest piece memorializes my maternal grandmother Vivienne Agnes Stokes (nee Bennett) who I never met because she committed suicide in 1928 in Bulawayo, Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe). This music sings of Vivienne’s agonies, both before and during her untimely death.
   
OK. it's confession time. In case you hadn't guessed, it's not my piece at all, it's Henry Purcell's, from his short opera Dido and Aeneas (1689). Henry's greatest fan, Peter Gore-Purcell, shamelessly made off with His Musicke and with some deft surgery tacked on one extra soprano voice - that of Vivienne, who (according to her daughter, my late mother Noreen Stokes) was a sensitive musician and highly competent pianist. Thus, adding my own metaphorical cornflour to Purcell's already-delicious musical soup, the texture of the original solo aria thickens into a duet. I justify such audacious sacrilege in part because Purcell loved duets and wrote many.
 
Nevertheless, I hasten to point out that Vivienne and Dido's Lament remains merely an adaption - but it demanded to be created, as it was becoming a thorough nuisance ricocheting round my head. Purcell is the towering Artist, I remain the admiring apprentice.
If you're unfamiliar with Purcell's original, you could hardly do better than first to hear Emma Kirkby and her crystal clear soprano voice on Youtube, accompanied by the languid sound of a 17th-century viol consort. Viols resemble the human voice even more closely than modern Strings because their notes have a slower 'attack' due to the bow-hair being less taut. The clip begins with the short recitative sung by Dido to her maid-servant Belinda, sadly informing her that she intends soon to stab herself. During the orchestral postlude, she is accompanied offstage by Belinda and carries out the deed. The above link will open in a new window for convenience.
Listen to how things change when Vivienne joins Dido in a suicide pact. Connect your device to a decent sound system or enclosed headphones, then click the orange PLAY button...



Alternatively (in particular if you are on a not-so-smartphone), you can access my recording at its original SoundCloud URL by clicking here. Either way, my mp3 file is downloadable and free.
Please listen through a quality sound-system or enclosed headphones, or you may lose the very necessary bass-line (I assure you that you'll be wasting your time if you listen through your tinny laptop speakers). 
 
My recording was synthesized using Sibelius 6 software which, unfortunately, cannot yet be persuaded to pronounce lyrics. The two voice parts are therefore only in 'vocalize' style, but the lyrics are simple enough to follow anyway...
iii
iiiiiiiiiiii When I am laid in earth
iiiiiiiiiiii May my wrongs create no trouble in thy breast; [repeat]
iiiiiiiiiiii Remember me, but ah! forget my fate. [repeat]
iii 
However, even if you don't read music well, the easy-to-follow words in the printed score will surely assist in understanding the two singers as they interweave.  The pdf score is available here on Scribd, free, downloadable, and copyright-free in the public domain. This link will open in a new window, enabling you to scroll through the music while listening. All I ask of intending performers is that you acknowledge Peter Gore-Symes as the arranger.
 
Vivienne's story
My mother (pianist Noreen Stokes) was ten years old when her mother Vivienne died mysteriously behind closed doors.  Her father promptly passed her and her brother into the less-than-willing care of disinterested grandparents, and never confided anything to them about their mother’s grim death. Consequently, mum was haunted throughout her life by the grotesque questions of How and Why. There was an impenetrable wall of silence which she was still too cautious to broach even when, as an elderly man, her father visited us in Singapore in the mid-1950s. The awful secrets died with him, much to my mother’s great remorse - she regretted never being courageous enough to ask.
 
Then, unexpectedly, only about 2 years ago, by which time my mother was 92 and almost blind, one of her relatives unearthed my grandmother's death certificate from the just-released Zimbabwe Archives. On it, the coroner's conclusion was "Arsenical poisoning (Suicide)". And if the gritty detail of an associated family legend is also accurate, it wasn't pretty, and I’ll spare you. I felt reluctant to relay much of the news to Mum in her old age for fear of traumatizing her further. To stir it all up again somehow seemed unkind, too late, and pointless in the end. But now that my mother has also passed away, I feel the personal need to write it out of my system, almost as if on her behalf. Indeed, I can well imagine Vivienne on her deathbed, dearly wishing she could have sung Dido's very words "forget my fate" to her devastated young daughter who was waiting anxiously in the wings for any scrap of news.
 
In Defence of the Indefensible: re-writing Purcell
Borrowing a canonical masterpiece such as Dido’s Lament and being arrogant enough to alter it risks obvious accusations of gilding the lily ...or worse. Why would you attempt to "improve" the Mona Lisa, you ask. Well, when standing on the shoulders of giants, one can see a great deal further... but by the same token one also has much further to fall. I stand accused of Aggravated Rebranding, and can offer little by way of excuse, but beg you to [a] excuse my indulgence, and [b] expect the unexpected. Be boldly prepared to suspend your disbelief. Above all, don’t hope that your beloved Dido will sound the same as that treasured CD in your collection, or of course you’ll be disappointed.
 
But in one sense Purcell's music hasn’t been altered. I have very largely preserved his original Dido in musical formalin (apart from a few tiny - but dispensable - tweaks to the accompanying strings). Even the Intro and Outro have been kept pristinely intact.
 
Purcell's key of g-minor also remains unchanged, even though I looked sideways at Vivienne's high A and toyed with lowering the key of the entire aria to f-minor. However, every Baroque composer worth their salt knew that a modulation to g-minor was the appropriate Harbinger of sadness, tragedy, and death, the musical Grim Reaper of the myth-oriented seventeenth-century operatic world*. The key of  f-minor was usually reserved for scary scenes foreboding the appearance of Witches - hardly suitable here. No question about it - Vivienne must bravely keep her high A.
 
 It’s just that I added one extra vocal line... one that Henry may not have thought of. Composers of mediaeval motets got up to this kind of lark all the time. For today’s lovers of mid-Baroque music, however, habituated to a comfortably familiar armchair ride with one of their favourite pot-boilers, tolerating even the smallest alteration or add-on can be a mighty tough ask. This can be true even when the arranger has attempted to “write-in-the-style-of" ...let alone adding cheeky non-idiomatic touches! But what the heck - on this occasion, I feel recklessly impelled to bypass our stuffy 21st-century cultural gatekeepers. Yes, I'm afraid you're going to have to be brave, grit your teeth, and deal with it. History is on my side.
 
Nuts & Bolts
Purcell built Dido’s Lament using the standard Baroque device known as the Ground Bass, a short melodic phrase repeated many times in the bass. It is literally the ground, the foundation, upon which the music is constructed. It just rumbles on forever, over and over, like Old Father Time grinding relentlessly on.** This particular Ground descends slowly through chromatically stepwise notes, analogous to a chilly staircase stretching out before one’s feet, as if leading down to the grave. To emphasize its vital role, and to assist the listener to remember it, Purcell decided to quote it solo as a lead-in before the voices begin (highlighted in blue). In this excerpt, string parts have been omitted:
 
 The constant recycling of the Ground Bass throughout the aria serve to underscore Dido’s obsessive, circular thinking about her loss of her lover Aeneas, the painful recollection of happy moments, the sick-hearted imagining of alternate outcomes.***
 
Interestingly, in the orchestral postlude immediately after the singing is finished and Dido and Vivienne are doing away with themselves, the first violin performs a similar falling chromatic line. It slowly sinks down through the same octave span, but in a much higher, far more 'celestial' pitch range. Achingly beautiful, melancholy and spacious... but just a little spooky once you realize the intended allusion to Dido sinking down into her grave. It could also be thought of as the ghost of the Ground Bass, especially given the gothically hollow sound of the very last chord (which, in the consciously anachronistic tradition of mediaeval cadencing, conspicuously lacks its usual "padding"... in this case the G-minor triad is bereft of its expected B-flat).
 
 Purcell was a master of the expressive devices such as the suspension, essentially the art of using strategically-placed "wrong notes" to heighten emotional poignancy. Of this, Samuel Butler once quipped that "discords make the sweetest airs”. I find it deliciously ironic that the wrong note is usually the most beautiful one.
 
Dissonances from such "wrong" notes, glittering and flashing like tiny inset diamonds, are frequently found scattered across Purcell's scores, often serving to intensify a sad word or phrase. Metaphorically, they could be felt as little stabs of musical pain. In Dido's Lament, Purcell mostly contrives to make these dissonances fall in pitch in order to resolve (or "correct" themselves). The first example occurs promptly in the opening phrase "When I am la...id..." in which the first of the two notes allocated to the word "laid" strains against the new harmony. The second half of the word is consequently drawn strongly downwards - as if by irresistable gravitational heartstrings.  
  
 This falling gesture imitates the profile of the voice of a person sobbing in grief, “the spirit sinking step by step, straining to recover, then sinking again."*** This manipulation of dissonance, that sweetest source of musical sorrow, with its consequent ebb-and-flow of tension, lies at the heart of the genre and character of the Lament.
 
 The attentive listener to Vivienne's part may also detect a gradual transition from Consonant to Dissonant, from Sweetness to Bitterness, from Clarity to Confusion. I imagined Vivienne's thoughts beginning to jumble and panic as the poison began to take hold as she gradually faded. As a consequence, her notes increasingly collide with the other lines in the music: and therein lie opportunities for further moments of dissonance and dark despair.
 
Unlike Dido, however, some of Vivienne's dissonant "wrong" notes actually fail to resolve or "correct" themselves. These constitute some of the non-idiomatic touches to which I referred. Their musical tension is thereby prolonged and unrelieved - which I felt was exactly in accord with the spirit of Vivienne's story, its sinister absence of answers. They are my mother's torments over How and Why.
 
 Another exquisite feature of Purcell’s song is the insistent, even desperate, repetition of “Re-mem-ber me”, the four repeated notes evoking the tolling of some distant funerary bell, or (as Alex Ross put it), “a Morse-code signal from oblivion”. Goose-bump material. Of course I retained Dido's repeated notes (how could anyone do otherwise?), but made Vivienne's fall chromatically - in the spirit of the Lament. In fact, most Vivienne's shorter phrases tend to fall, whereas her longer lines mostly invoke the contour of arched sighs (screams, perhaps?), rising first before the inevitable plunge down.
   
 Finally, during the agonizingly tender string postlude, both Vivienne and Dido depart this world. The crucial difference between them, however, is that Dido is merely acting an operatic role.
 
And there's the interesting fact that Dido's phrases often don't consistently align with the Ground Bass - except at structurally significant cadence points. The vocal phrases drape themselves freely and at length over the short and rigidly repeated bass. Purcell understood that overlapping like this in such an irregular manner would not only generate interest through contrast, but would also facilitate an almost constant rainbow spectrum of harmonic hues to add to the pathos of human feeling. Genius, sir!  Hats off to Mr Purcell - I've stood by his grave next to the organ in Westminster Abbey. On the other hand, I haven't yet managed to locate Vivienne's grave - which only intensifies the mystery, like a closing sentence conspicuously lacking its full-stop  
Vivienne Agnes Stokes (née Bennett) in 1927, the year before she died.
 
  By way of irrelevant post-script, it's interesting to note that the practice of using a Ground Bass (or 'Obstinato' Bass) originally came from the rollicking late 16th century Italian peasant dance called the Ciaccona (Fr: Chaconne), whose typical bassline repeated a simple 4-note descending fragment such as G - F - Eb - D.
Some later composers (such as Purcell) merely filled in the intervening chromatic notes and slowed the tempo down in order to allow more complex harmonies extra time to "breathe". With these touches of the compositional brush, the formula for what had been regarded as a raunchily daring 'Tango-like' dance was transformed into the tearfully languishing Lament. In this sense Purcell was not a ground-breaking innovator [ouch - excuse the pun] ...he had inherited an existing recipe then proceeded to adapt and distil it masterfully into a connoiseur whisky.

  




* Baroque audiences were easily able to hear the key changes, not because they possessed the facility of perfect pitch, but because the Meantone Temperament (tuning system) of Purcell's day caused each different key to be tuned in its own characteristic and unique way (also known as 'key colour'). A modulation to the key of g-minor was automatically associated with Grief, Pathos, Tragedy and Death. Other keys signified different states. For more, click here to open an information page in its own window.      xxxxx
** Incidentally, whether listening to Purcell's music or my version of it, I recommend the experience of sending your ears down to the Ground Bass and focusing on it, rather than the voice[s]. If you've not tried that before, the outcome could be revealing, and you may never hear the aria in quite the same way again. Perhaps think of it as "X-ray listening". The voice is easy enough to hear anyway in this piece, and will take care of itself. 
xxxx
 *** Alex Ross. Chacona, Lamento, Walking Blues in Listen to This. Fourth Estate, London, 2010, p.41.

Monday, 2 January 2012

Trio Nearly in C-minor (Bach Corrects a Student's Composition Exercise)

     
This trio (for Flute, Bb Clarinet, & Contrabass), bears the sub-title "Bach Corrects a Student's Composition Exercise". Although the title suggests a lighthearted "the-dog-ate -my-homework" attitude, the music is nevertheless a serious two-minute micro-essay encapsulating a musico-pedagogical issue which bothers me deeply. In fact, one might claim that the entire future of serious music composition - and acceptance by audiences - depends on discovering solutions to it. Yep, it's another angle on the "old-VS-new" debate. 
spacer
Rather like fiddling with prayer beads, my piece obsessively counterpoints the melodic fragment (at left) which is to some extent counter-intuitive to "normal" diatonic musical syntax.  It stubbornly resists 'working' in the conventional ways which the diatonic ear has long been propagandized to expect. Trio Nearly in C-minor sets out to reconcile this "square-peg-in-a-round-hole" issue, and at one point even gets the benefit of a little subtle encouragement and modelling from the Master (originally, of course, in red-ink quill pen).
spacer
Connect your device to a decent sound system or enclosed headphones, and click the orange PLAY button. Apologies in advance for the lousy quality recording - my Sibelius file corrupted [grr]. 


 
Alternatively, if you're on a smartphone, you could listen to the music at its original URL:
 http://soundcloud.com/peter-gore-symes/trio-nearly-in-c-minor
spacer
And if you wish, you can read the pdf score here.
The transposing score is here.
Both the music (mp3) and score are downloadable and free. Prospective performers are only requested to acknowledge me as the composer on programs, fliers, sleeve notes or announcements. I'd also be kinda flattered if you let me know, too :)
spacer  

 spacer
A genuine forensic reconstruction of the real face of J.S. Bach.
In this link, you can witness a historically unprecedented gallery
of photos of Bach as a child, a teenage rapper, and even one taken
during His previously unknown concert tour to Thailand in 1733.
spacer
 Trio Nearly in C-minor is a token attempt to absolve myself of the sin of years of preaching the Holy Musical Rules (yes, 'those' Common Practice Rules handed down to you on tablets of stone from Bach and Moses during those endless Harmony & Counterpoint tutorials). Thou Shalt Not end a piece with a first inversion. Thy Leading Note must rise, not fall. Parallel fifths or octaves are sinful, etc etc. Sure, you could recite them too?
spacer
 I knew that continuing to teach The Rules, ultimately, was to knowingly collaborate in creating a poisoned chalice for the future of Composition. There I was, assisting to brew up an educational potion which had the potential to cause serious long-term paralysis of our culture's collective creative/receptive mind. A doh-ray-mi straight-jacket to anaethsetize the creative musical brain which had been born free-and-curious. What had I been thinking?? OK, here comes the excuse: I had to earn a living, mate. Yep, some people do it for money, lol. (Blush) This still happens in educational institutions ranging from the "ta ta tee-tee ta" pre-school variety right through to undergraduates honing their skill at writing four-part harmony. Been there, done the lot. Cramped a lot of imaginations. Ruined countless lives.
spacer
 Music Composition is surely the ultimate candidate for nomination as a Rule-Free Creative Zone. Therefore it bothers me that The Rules get handed on so unquestioningly, usually with rather vague understanding of why they even exist, or who made them up. People have been fed the idea that music is somehow controlled by inviolable universal natural laws which could not possibly be questioned. Musicians get awarded impressive Degrees and Diplomas for reproducing and obeying The Rules. They then go out and, in turn, pass on their half-knowledge to other victims, usually younger and powerless to resist. And thus the cycle repeats down the generations... a virtually identical process ever since the start of the 19th century when musical academies kicked off in a big way. And even Arnold Shoenberg's commented wryly that "Zair iss shtill a lot off goot music to be reeten in C-machor, ya?". Yes, undeniably true - I've done heaps myself, of course - but my point is: Why limit oneself to a bread-only diet?
spacer
 The problem is inflexible and difficult to tackle - music is arguably THE most conservative of the Arts. Most people will accept innovative modern art, architecture, literature, etc, as a cool thing, but when it comes to music most folks, even some "music lovers", just want something familiar and easy, a safe and predictable armchair ride, mindless chewing-gum for their ears.
spacer
And from the music teacher's point of view it is all too easy to continue to teach an established method which clones exactly such safe and un-challenging panaceas. You can buy ready-made mass-produced text-books divided into neat eminently teachable chunks designed to fit conveniently into semesters. To teachers, the alternatives seem all too hard, requiring too much thawing of mindsets, re-jigging of knowledge, curricula, texts, and test papers... and probably wouldn't even occur as useful (let alone desirable) to most conventional musicians.
spacer
 Yes, one certainly needs to know [and understand] The Rules sufficiently well in order to break them successfully, but they are but one of the many systems of musical thought which have evolved over the last 2000 years or so.  How about if schools were to codify and teaching the style of the Notre Dame School of 12th century Paris? Or the Burgundian School around Dufay with their ear-tickling cadences? Or the Palestrina Style? The Debussy Style - (which actually requires parallel fifths)? Pan-Diatonicism? The Schoenberg-Webern Style? Quartal harmony? Minimalism? Raga? Micro-tonal scales? There are so many possible musical universes and systems apart from the narrow constraints of our beloved Bach. You need to break eggs to make omlettes.
spacer
Many contemporary composers who have consciously challenged and overcome the mental shackles of their Education (and, consequently, have grown Ears to Hear) are certainly using all these alternative doctrines - and more - but (crucially) their audiences, the vast public, are mostly limited to making judgements according to the fosillizing doctrines of Bach - whether or not they are aware of it. ("I dunno the first thing about music, mate, but I do know what I like, eh"). Indeed, they may not know a Leading Tone from a First Inversion, but they do have a surprisingly sophisticated understanding (albeit untutored, 'naive' and rigid) of what constitutes 'normality' in western music.
spacer
 Theirs is is an inarticulate understanding, partly intuitive, partly acquired, which has been absorbed simply by years of unconsciously hearing and absorbing "normal" music in locations ranging from supermarkets to concert halls. Everyone's a sponge... to varying degrees. Everyone will "learn" that just about all western music from Machaut to Mozart to Madonna has structural elements in common when it comes to topics like harmonic progression/regression, phrase structure, melodic conventions, key/tonality, form, etc.

This mute concensus, those understood commonalities of musical grammar and syntax are precisely what permits musicians to improvise together without rehearsal. They "know" the language - they intuit its grammatical conventions. Through sheer experience, they have learned the traditional hierarchy of probablities - a B7 chord is highly likely to be followed by some sort of chord based on E, not E-flat. The average listener (and even some musicians!) will instinctively squirm if phrases aren't symmetrically equal in length, if they can't tap their foot because the beat is ambiguous or absent, or if the harmonies deviate significantly from the expected Cycle of Fifths. People often prefer to reach for the OFF button than be forced to actually focus attention in the same way they would if, say, reading a book or (especially) the more passive activity of watching movies.
spacer
The end result of limiting options, simplifying and cloning musical education is that the average person tends to emerge with a clamped mind about what is Right or Wrong, Good or Bad in music. Those who become music students end up being able to write a stylistically correct Bach Chorale (in fact, so correct that it's boring as batshit), and that ol' magic just, well... evaporates.
spacer
At this point the proverbial elephant in the room ought to be apparent to the observant reader: relatively few musicians of any age - or audiences, for that matter - are likely to be craving new Bach Chorales in the year 2012. There are heaps of them out there to nick anyway, if you need to google something up for next Sunday's choir...
spacer
Let's face it, The Rules are nothing but a codified instruction manual for imitating the very specific style of music used in Protestant churches in (northern) Germany during the first half of the eighteenth century. A fairly narrow slice of musical history, one might observe. But even today that slice is preserved in historical ether and presented as Eternal Immutable Law to unsuspecting young devotees. The teaching of these precepts mostly happens in sterile tutorial rooms, soundless but for the scratching of pencils and rubbers. Very few students can actually hear anything they've written, but hey, they obeyed The Holy Rules, step-by-step, and passed their assignments with an A+.  May we present you with your shiny new BMus degree... now Go Ye Forth and propagate likewise.
spacer
In terms of a liberal Arts education, this is totally outrageous propaganda in the league of Chairperson Mao or Joe Goebbels. The method has fossilized into little more than a musical notation version of a "Join-the Dots" puzzle, a Composing-By-Steps 'How-To' Manual for tone-deaf people who can't hum two consecutive notes in tune let alone distinguish the three notes of a triad. It offers prescriptions which allow novices to write complex counterpoint which doesn't actually sound entirely "wrong", even if it is terminally klutzy, awkward, and uninspired, the dumbed-down musical equivalent of literature's opening line "It was a dark and stormy night". And for goodness sake, don't embarrass people by asking them to explain WHY they can't end with a first inversion, make their leading note fall, or write [gasp!] parallel fifths.
Yes. We. Can.
spacer
In my piece Trio Nearly in C-minor, Bach personally intervenes at one point to suggest a harmonisation of the melodic fragment in the style to which He is accustomed. I'm confident you'll detect when it happens (Clue: it's the bar in the score marked Lento Serioso Quasi Chorale). You'll be relieved to know that during that fragment He committed no parallel fifth sins. Bach judiciously decides to squeeze the fragment into the tonal straight-jacket of C-minor. To our ears, His sweetly familiar harmonic language with its formulaic predictable cadences homing in relentlessly towards the inevitable tonic c-minor chord seems, in this context, to be oddly and ironically out of place ...even 'wrong', or at least inappropriate.
spacer
The poor student whose work he is correcting :) thankfully appears to be entirely unrepentant - except that the piece does actually end on a (albeit extremely brief) token triad of C-minor as a polite concession to Great Teacher. It's as if the music's embarrassed not to cadence in C-minor, having spent most of the piece nowhere near C-minor or any other type of minor or major for that matter. And [*shock*] the final triad isn't even in first inversion! My my, isn't tradition tenacious?! But hey, ya haff please the teacher if you vant to pass, ja?  Er, 7 out of 10 was OK, I suppose... Hmm, let's see, what do I need to do to score 8 next semester?
spacer
Dear Reader, having joked thus, I must emphasize that I certainly do not disrespect Bach. On the contrary, if you've heard my other compositions, you'll know that I meekly worship His music, and take his Holy Rules seriously. They are part of the cultural DNA inherited by all of us, practising musician and non-musician listeners alike. But unless we really do want yet another Chorale, The Rules should only be a point of stylistic departure, merely one of the available options in the 21st-century's incredibly rich Global Style Buffet. An unexpected mixture of systems, even conflicting ones, can produce interestingly tasty results: fusion cuisine comes to mind. Impossible opposites can be a great source of inspiration, if you grant them an educational visa to enter your mind. Someone should tell the Music Educators.
space

For your delectation and relief, here's my latest piece of Concept Music, cereally composed over breakfast this morning with the textbook Harmony & Counterpoint for Dummies open on my lap.
The easy-to-perform musical score goes as follows:
spacer
..... 1. Close your eyes and gaze into your Blackness...
..... 2.  ...then into that Vast Silence begin to imagine a
........... .tender duet between a Whale and a Mosquito.
..... 3.  Allow them each to solo, then to sing together.....
..... 4.  Gradually allow the performers to fade away. 
..... 5.   When the music is finished, open your eyes and
..... 6.   if you enjoyed the performance, applaud.
spacer
*Try performing the music again to discover if it is the same on the second time around.
*Try performing it a third time with animals/sound-sources of your own choice.
Thankyou thankyou thankyou
You've been a wonderful audience I love you all.

Apologies for the noise in this recording - there was a problem with the file [grr *shrug*].
spacer

Monday, 24 October 2011

How Slowly Dark - a musical tribute to pianist Noreen Stokes

Noreen Stokes records for Radio Malaya in September 1957,
three years before migrating to Australia.
  spacer
 My latest piece, How Slowly Dark, is a humble attempt at a musical tribute to my late mother Noreen Stokes O.A.M., retired concert pianist, accompanist, and piano teacher. Her tragic and inexorably increasing blindness, eventually almost total, ironically paralleled the deafness of her beloved Beethoven.
spacer
Connect your device to a decent sound system, and click the orange PLAY button:



...or it can be accessed in the following link which will open in a new window:
 http://soundcloud.com/peter-gore-symes/how-slowly-dark
spacer
The idea behind How Slowly Dark leapt at me the moment when I read Theodore Roethke's haunting and melancholy lines:
spacer
spacerI see, in evening air,
spacerHow slowly dark comes down on what we do.
spacer
The piece is a dream-soundscape, deliberately rather formless and wandering - as dreams are. (I could make a score, but probably no-one will want to perform it... so why bother?) Strands of familiar piano music float from my childhood into the present moment, evolving on their journey into an aural tapestry, a private look into my mind's inner ear. Where will these fragments travel after this? And likewise, what is it that each of us might, in turn, bequeath to the future?
spacer
In particular, the music attempts to acknowledge the fundamental influence of mum's pianism on my guitar playing years, and later, extrapolating beyond that into my present composing. Even in my early years I used to comment that I wasn't really playing a guitar at all, but imagining a piano with a neck.
spacer
Instrumentation comprises: Piano, Classical guitar, Strings, ATTB choir, and tuned Percussion.

spacer
The opening fades up into a brief passage from Liszt's La Leggierezza, a virtuoso concert study which requires from the pianist a light, nimble, lyrical, and understated touch. The piano crossfades into a guitar adaption in a new key (as, in my misspent youth, I was often fond of doing).
spacer
Enter J.S.Bach - unexpectedly - smack in the middle of the guitar passage. One of the concealed elements glueing this patchwork dream together is a Bach Chorale, the same one borrowed by Alban Berg for his Violin Concerto, his tribute to Manon Gropius. Es ist Genug ("It is Enough, Take Me Now") was one of the last chorales written by the ageing Bach when he was going blind: I therefore deemed it to be eminently suited to the present circumstance, especially given that my mother enjoyed learning German. I borrowed Bach's melodic tritone (G, A, B, C#. See Box 1, below):
The opening of Bach's chorale Es Ist Genug, performed as 'vocalise' on this recording.
The original key was A-major, highly symbolic because Bach symbolised its three
 sharps as the crosses on Calvary Hill. Hey, one cross is enough for me. 
(PS: Bach is not responsible for the last few notes).
spacer
 Although the fragment in Box 1 is entirely tonal, functional, and - yes - 'legal' in Bach's harmonic language, I nevertheless grasped the opportunity to fashion the whole tone scale into un-Bachlike whole-tone harmonies, especially my beloved augmented triad. As a child, my ear gravitated instinctively towards any occurences of augmented triads (major triad with sharpened fifth degree), although then, of course, I had no technical words nor understanding, just feeling. Here, today, it constitutes the perfect compositional excuse to evolve towards Dubussy, yes? Sure, I can do anything I choose inside my own dream. The dear old augmented triad has not dulled with age or familiarity... formal musical education has failed to erase its melancholic magic (thank goodness).
spacer
But Bach can always be mined deeper. Box 3 (see the bottom of the score) is a series of rising chromatic semi-tones. This motif becomes a "pillar of the temple" in the dreamworld of How Slowly Dark, woven throughout the entire piece no matter which composer happens to be at hand. The observant ear will already have detected it pervading the Liszt-based passages for guitar and choir. Liszt beat me to the idea, dang it. Fragments of it - as well as the whole-tone elements - emerge and recede frequently in the fabric of the sound like a kind of structural glue. Eggs in the musical cake-mix, perhaps. The chorale is only quoted at any length at the very end of the piece - as was Bach's own habit in his Cantatas. It may be worthy of note that both these elements, the whole-tone scale and the chromatic semi-tones, rise in pitch - and (hopefully) in spirit - surely an appropriate metaphor for my mother.
spacer
At about 20sec, the strings fade up in C major during the E major guitar passage, converging on a cadence which merges the two keys into a chord of E augmented (E, G#, B#,  which is enharmonically equivalent to a chord of C augmented, ie C, E, G#):
(Interesting to note, by the way, that Es ist Genug is the only
one of Bach's chorales in which He used all twelve tones)
spacer
 The F, F# and G of the cello and double-bass are part of a normal formulaic Baroque cadence in the key of C major (implying ii - V/V - V), whereas in the context of E major, Liszt's E#, F# and F-double sharp perform a highly chromatic and purely melodic/colour role. Aligning these enharmonic notes whilst superimposing and contrasting their keys makes for an interestingly ambiguous cadence: is the root C or E? In effect, it's both, really - the guitar's low E is very close in pitch to the cello's C, so there is no obvious front-runner in terms of the chord's perceived root note. After this brief Ives-inspired side-trip (thanks, Charles!), the guitar resumes briefly back in E major - just as if nothing had happened. Perhaps it hadn't even noticed the choir...
spacer
As the guitar fades, the dream drifts into a meditative choral arrangement - the same piece of Liszt, yet utterly transformed. The paradigm Piano > Guitar > Third mediuma sequence neatly summarizing my entire musical life (as in "Listener, then Guitarist, lately Composer"), sets the underlying format for subsequent sections of the piece.  The choir begins multi-layering the rising chromatic motif in the manner of an introduction, after which it presents a quartal re-harmonisation of the four-square Liszt melody.
spacer
As the voices fade on a cadence of C augmented, who should materialize out of the mist but Monsieur Debussy. The first movement of Debussy's Pour Le Piano deliberately explored augmented chords by using them in a non-functional and colouristic manner (ie requiring no 'resolution'). Rebellion! Mutiny!  Mozart's Universe turned on its musical head. Crikey, these chords were no longer expected to resolve to pre-ordained destinations - they could just "be". I recall as a child hearing my mother play Pour Le Piano and vaguely thinking "Hey, there's that funny sound again... and gosh, there's another... and another!" Interesting to reflect that Debussy's piece was composed in 1901, a mere sixteen years before my mother's birth.
spacer
 Meanwhile, Bach's chorale again looms up like a pale watercolour wash to provide a ghostly background floating behind Debussy's stridently rhythmic piano chords. This time the choir offers the rising whole-tones of the opening phrase itself, Es ist Genug: It is Enough.
spacer
 As per the blueprint, Debussy's piano gives way to a guitar adaption - necessarily a thin-blooded mock-up and hardly a match for the piano, of course.  What was I thinking! Thankfully, stimulated by Debussy's strings of augmented chords, my dream dissolves into a more guitaristically sympathetic and lyrical passage of guitar with string accompaniment. This is actually a brief quotation of my own piece for chamber orchestra, Reconciliation, whose sound-world seems (on the surface) to be as stylistically remote from Debussy's pianism as it is possible to be. Nevertheless, in musical terms, it is closely DNA-related by its free use of of augmented harmonies à la Debussy. Thank you so much... may I call you Claude?  And of course - equally - thank you to my mother for performing it so sublimely. Both pieces do what Herr Bach would have considered ridiculous and illogical - attempting to tonicize/stabalize a chromatically-altered chord whose normal "Common Practice" syntactic function is that of a species of dominant (by its nature inherently unstable).
spacer
 After the string passage, the violin evaporates in a rising whole-tone scale (generated - again - by the augmented harmony), into which Chopin delicately floats the theme of his Ballade No 1, another pianistic pot-boiler from my youth. My mother adored Chopin, who, in his heart-warming and enlightened Romantic Wisdom, invariably managed to remember to obey The Golden Rule which obliged the sharpened fifth note to resolve by step (in this case, Bb to A):

 But the ever-observant Guitarist :-) notices the rising augmented triad (bracketed above) and immediately feels inspired to let loose a volley of three successive augmented arpeggios, each one beginning a semi-tone higher, recalling the earlier chromatic motif. In this manner the two motifs, based respectively on the whole-tone and the semi-tone, are finally merged, and thus the circle is completed. And not even one of the augmented chords feels any pressure to resolve. Do I pass my test, Monsieur Debussy?
spacer
 Several passing percussionists, one of whom may well have been Toru Takemitsu, notice the three semi-tone motif and decide to play with it as a cat teases a mouse. This continues in a rhythm-free microtonal zone until the guitar steps in, tentatively takes matters into hand by re-instating tempo, crystallizing an unexpectedly conventional cadence, and framing attention back onto the piano's final entry. We hear a snatch of Schumann's Papillons (from Carnaval Op.2, another of my mother's epic favourites), before it disintegrates into nothingness. It is in its original key of C, even though this fragment begins on its V chord (G). The tonic C is only implied, not stated.
spacer
 The Schumann is soon comprehensively submerged by the Chiangmai Bach Choir's otherworldly vocalise of the entire opening section of the chorale Es Ist Genug continuing in a radiantly clear G major, thereby prolonging the dominant of C.  Its three phrases, too, fade slowly, glacier-like in their tenacity and endurance - almost as if locked in a hapless struggle against inevitably encroaching Darkness. Heightening the sense of "unfinished-ness" is the fact that although the chorale begins anchored on the tonicized centre of G, the last phrase skids off a banana-skin C# towards its dominant key, D. But not only that, but you land gingerly on a very un-final and slippery triad of D augmented. The music ends before it finishes, awash in a sea of ambiguity, heart-breaking pathos, and incompletely fulfilled potential. One thing's for sure, whatever comes after the final silence is always up to you.
spacer
By now the final three notes of the chorale excerpt (G#, A, A#) will probably be more self-explanatory (refer back to Box 2 in the first diagram). Analytically, the final harmony could be C: II#5, ...or perhaps C:V#5/V ...or your ear might demand G:V#5 (or even D:I#5 if you were totally outfoxed by the persistent C#) ...but aw heck, who really cares? It feels tonicized/completed in a strange kind of a way, but it isn't. It can't be - unless you decide to let it. Whatever the case, the Memory will probably linger in your mind after the Sound has died away.
spacer
Noreen Stokes was awarded the Order of Australia Medal in January 2000
for services to music, especially for accompaniment and art song.
spacer
 spacer
spacer
She organised a recital soon after arriving in post-war London from Capetown.
spacer
(Click on any picture if you need to biggen it)
spacer
 spacer
 By Xmas 2007, mum could just manage to see a small faint area under strong lights.
She still maintained her discipline of technical practice every morning from 7-8 am.
Nowadays (2011), she feels too disheartened to even attempt to go to a piano.
spacer
Post Script: Noreen Stokes passed away
on Sunday 11 March 2012, aged 94.
RIP at long last, Mum.
I can still hear your music.

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Fibonacci's Rabbits - the sound of one mathematician thinking.

Does one always need to know what music is "about" before listening to it?  It's head VS heart. Go with your heart this time and listen first. Connect your device to a decent sound system or enclosed headphones, and click the orange PLAY button:


mm
Alternatively, you could listen to the music at its URL:
http://soundcloud.com/peter-gore-symes/fiibonaccis-rabbits-the-sound


If you wish, you can read the score here. It will open in a new window so you can read it while listening:
mm
mm

Many things in Nature, such as cabbages, pine-cones, sunflowers and snail-shells all grow in spiral patterns controlled by the series of numbers known as the Fibonacci Series. The 12th century mathematician Leonardo Fibonacci discovered that exponential growth occurred if the last two numbers of any series were added together (eg, 1+1=2; 1+2=3; 2+3=5; 3+5=8; 5+8=13; 8+13=21, etc). As with Bartok, who always composed with a pine-cone on his desk, these numbers provided the very simple genesis for my short piece "Fibonacci's Rabbits".
 
When considering the dimension of musical Pitch (assuming one is counting by semitone), the Fibonacci Sequence neatly generates the ratios which create the intervals comprising the major triad. The 'cell' in the first bar-and-a-half of my piece, for instance, outlines the triad of C-major. At this point I choose to bypass the usual debate arguing "Co-incidence or Causality?" ...as that is not my purpose here.
 
The Fibonacci Series can also be applied to the dimension of Time. Counting by demi-semi quaver (DSQ), my cell exponentially stretches out in time-values as the numbers of DSQ obey the dictates of the series.
  mm
Once I had established the mechanical aspects of this cell, however, Rationality was summarily overuled by Art. I proceeded to present the cell in the freely imitative fashion of a Renaissance motet, symbolic of the ordered growth yet highly chaotic interaction of plants in Nature. This image was triggered in the first instance by watching the astonishingly rapid growth of the Climbing Spinach Vine on our balcony in Chiangmai.
spacer
The Fibonacci Series can be taken a step further - to suggest Form in music. As the ratios of the numbers spirals from 1+1=2 right through to higher numbers such as 13+21=34, 21+34=55 and so forth, the ratio increasingly accurately converges towards the decimal fraction 0.618, known as the 'Golden Mean', an irrational mathematical constant. View more complete examples here and here. In my example, the number 21 comprises approximately 0.618 of the number 34. Hence in my music, not unlike the music of countless other composers throughout history, I engineered the the climactic point to occur at about six-tenths of the way through - an aesthetically pleasing proportion which defiantly avoids symmetry. Botticelli's 'painting, the Birth of Venus' is a visual demonstration of the principle. He even included a shell for good measure.
mm
I gleefully noted the presence of the G# just after the triad in my cell, which immediately authorized me to write my beloved augmented triads (C-E-G#). The successive entries of the cell in the keys of C, E, and G# (bars A/B/C) resulted in the extended high-pitched augmented triad which materialises in the high notes towards the end of Bar 6:

Similarly, personal choice determined the extended quartal harmonies - traditionally and accoustically  more stable/final than augmented triads - which serve to conclude the piece:
The final gesture includes the only instance of a cell which falls in pitch - symbolic, perhaps, of decay and death  as the necessary counterbalance of growth, the ends of empires, the eternal wheel of life.
 

Other interesting stuff about the Fibonacci Series:
* The piano keyboard from C to C has 13 keys comprising 8 white keys and 5 black keys, split into groups of 3 and 2.
* In any key, the 'dominant' note is the 5th note of the scale, which is also the 8th note of all 13 notes that comprise the octave. Note that 8:13 = 0.61538, which approximates phi. It's precisely that assymetric wildcard which makes a musician's (and theoretician's) life interesting and happily irrational.
* The spiral layout of cabbage leaves ensures that the smart little plant receives the maximum possible sunlight over the span of a day.

Thursday, 23 September 2010

Diverse Variations on "Happy Birthday". Don't send 'em soppy e-cards, send this mp3 instead








 Ever need to email someone a fun-quirky (but tastefully arty and not crass) birthday greeting?

Here's your uber-cool solution. I have concocted a short set of variations on (you guessed it)  'Happy Birthday' ...and it's, like, free.
Why not try it out now? Connect your device to a decent sound system or enclosed headphones and click on the orange PLAY button:



Alternatively, you could listen to the music at its URL:
 http://soundcloud.com/peter-gore-symes/variations-on-happy-birthday
mm
 It's a quartet for flute, oboe, bassoon and a part-time percussionist). You can download a free copy in mp3 format, in a file-size that's easy to email. Whenever one of your friends has a birthday, forward them a copy with my compliments. Guaranteed low in carbs. Bingo.
mm
QUIZ: One of the variations features an embedded version of a signature Beatles song. Ten marks if you can name it.
mm 
I doubt anyone but the true dilletante will want a score, so there is no link for that. I could easily make one if requested, though, and hey, I'd probably feel sorta flattered :-)

Wednesday, 30 September 2009

Kaleidoscope for String Septet



Kaleidoscope (4 violins, viola, cello, and double bass) sets out to be the aural equivalent of a kaleidoscope's ever-mutating patterns and colours. This project has been gestating for ages, yet remains as a draft for a bigger piece.

Connect your device to a decent sound system or enclosed headphones, and click the orange PLAY button...


mm
Alternatively, you could listen to the music at its URL:
http://soundcloud.com/peter-gore-symes/kaleidoscope


If you wish, you can read the score (in pdf format) here. It will open in a new window so you can follow the score while you listen.
Both the (mp3) recording and the score are free and downloadable.
mm
I've deliberately selected a mono-chromatic photo to represent my piece because the music employs only string timbre... it awaits a future project to significantly vary the instrumental colour palette as well. This 'limitation', however, enabled me to focus on harmonic colour. Another huge advantage of 100% string instrumentation is the ability of strings to blend so seamlessly - very useful to my purposes here.
m
The project was inspired principally by the French composer Perotin (of the late 12th century Notre Dame School)... but actually sounds very little like him (oh, how I do delight in being contrary and annoyingly cryptic :-) I've always been impressed by the vision and magnificence of Perotin's organa such as Viderunt Omnes (this link to Youtube opens in a new window: after listening, simply close it, and you'll be back here). Its cornucopia of cascading sound was Perotin's musical response to the glittering kaleidoscopic refractions of light flooding in through the enormous stained glass windows of the then newly-completed gothic Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris. One can't help also recalling Messiaen for the same reason, of course... I'm sure they would have enjoyed a chat.
mm
Magister Perotin was in awe of the sheer height of the cathedral's lofty ceiling, which soared vertiginously above all the comparitively squat architecture of the conventional Romanesque architecture of the day. It was this which prompted him expand the music of his predecessor Leonin from two parts to four, a vertical expansion analagous to the very cathedral in which the music was to be performed. Now, with four parts, Perotin could now weave a denser musical web of sound, more a massed sonic "fabric" rather than the limpid clarity of Leonin's two polyphonic strands. Not only creative and visionary, but mighty courageous, I'd say. Respect, dude... high fives, etc. The Beethoven of the 12th century, no less.
m
Perotin, like most church musicians of the time, composed by successively adding melodic layers above the Cantus Firmus, or lowest voice. The Cantus Firmus (CF) was usually a melodic fragment of Gregorian Chant, but stretched out to be so glacially slow that its melodic character was effectively denied, serving instead simply as a musical foundation (these days it's the 'bass') on which to build upwards. This not only offered the composer ready-made tonal structure on which to add his own layers, but conveniently ensured that the church could not criticize the music for ignoring God or the liturgy. However by contrast, in my piece Kaleidoscope, the CF is both freely composed and decidedly secular - vaguely inspired by the theme from the Pink Panther. Those slow-moving parallel fifths appealed to my Debussy-inspired bad-boy streak, my love of questioning not only the What but also the Why of the so-called "Rules" of music. Anyone in the Arts who adheres to Rules needs to be interrogated under hot lights.
m
For instance, one of the traditional cornerstones among the Rules of conventional part-writing is the preference for "contrary motion"... eg, when one part falls, the other[s] rise, etc. So [perversely], I decided to move all my parts in similar or parallel motion. The four lowest parts [comprising the CF] move solidly in parallel octaves and fifths (8,5,16,32) - hence the faint suggestion of the Pink Panther. As with mediaeval organum, this is, in reality, a 'thickened' single line, the cello, viola, and fourth violin merely reinforcing the contrabass by amplifying its primary overtones. To get high enough, in fact, the fourth violin plays in harmonics throughout, soaring quietly over the other violins, creating not so much a melodic contribution of its own but a faint and mysterious overtone haze. Only at the Chorale-style coda are the four instruments in this lower group given any real melodic independence from each other - this is purposefully done at that point in order to prompt the listener's expectations of a more conventional polyphonic 'tonal' environment.
m
Likewise, the three violins jointly constitute [for the most part] another single thickened line, tightly bound together, moving mostly similar motion like strands of a rope. I nursed the very tactile image of shoppers jostling in the crowded alleys between market stalls - personal space in Thailand is practically a non-issue. I also imagined the violin "trio" as a metaphor for a churning river of sound, like a painter twisting his brush as he moves it over the canvas. These three strands are melodically independent of each other, but I made them obey several self-imposed restrictions (mm, yeah, OK..."rules"!):
m
1. The three strands are confined mostly within a narrow tessitura of [about] a fourth. When an upper or lower voice rises or falls, the others are obliged to follow [albeit in a quite elastic manner] in order to respect that narrow tessitura. That way, the ear is more likely to hear them as a single entity, a broad 'ribbon' of sound.
m
2. Harmony is mostly quartal/secondal. Some conventional chordal moments do occur, but only as momentary flashes of colour as if from facets of a revolving diamond. Relatively rare events like this are non-functional for the most part, and (statistically speaking) democratically represented within the extensive universe of intervallic possibilities inherent within the span of a fourth.
m
3. As with all harmony, quartal or otherwise, the succession of chords may be chosen to manipulate levels of relative consonance and dissonance. Needless to say, it is impossible to build a conventional triad within the span of a fourth. A chord built from two major seconds will sound relatively consonant by comparison to one built from a major second plus a minor second. Two minor seconds will seem even more dissonant. More so three... which is possible here because the violins are heard as an 'overlay' on top of the Cantus Firmus, generating almost limitless gradations of harmony and dissonance for the composer to manipulate. The three voices are not related to each other in any conventional sense according to the Rules of harmony or counterpoint, except at times of my strategic choice where I choose to hint salaciously at tonal direction. 
m
4. Staying roughly within the tessitura of a fourth does not preclude the three violins from approaching each other even more closely at chosen moments in order to generate increased harmonic tension [eg, see bars 17/18 and bar 38]. This process is the logical continuation of a thousand years worth of music history: the exploration of the harmonic potential of the upper end of the Overtone Series. It's already been done in Electronic Music because technology has made it easily possible. But it pays to keep things in perspective - Monteverdi in the seventeenth century was howled down by critics for using unacceptable dissonance... and he had done no more than write a 7th chord whose 7th wasn't suitably 'prepared in advance'. Um.
m
5. Importantly, the three violins should mostly remain rhythmically independent of each other. This deliberate offsetting of rhythms vastly increases the number of momentary passing chords and harmonic colours available on the composer's palette, sometimes two or three changes per quarter-note beat. It is the very genesis of the title "Kaleidoscope". This also serves to suppress any unequivocal sense of beat, which is left more to the slower-moving lower group, creating the effect of superimposing a fast movement over a slow one. The effect of such rhythmic independence in the trio is analagous to that of the painter smudging one colour into the next in gradual transition of hue.
m
In summary, while the score requires seven instruments, these actually function in two groups, ie., I conceived this essentially as two-part music [low in opposition to high]. Most of the time there is space between the two groups, as well as contrasting rhythms, so the ear may more easily distinguish them from each other. The bass group moves in a generally lower realm than the treble group, which prefers to soar higher in my conceptual Cathedral of sound-colour. On occasion, however, they do briefly collide and fuse. Between the two groups there is no consistent use of contrary motion: according to the dramatic needs of the moment, you will hear a mixture of similar and contrary motion.
m
All this talk of breaking rules seems a bit hollow when you suddenly realize that the entire piece is securely in the key of C. Not C-major, thank Buddha, but "C-centric": I weave a texture of harmonies around the note of C, not the chord of C. In a quasi-conventional way, there are vague tonal implications as the music approaches the dream sequence beginning at bar 26. The music gravitates back to the note of C at structurally significant points (eg., an implied cadence on C at bar 33, in spite of the G# bass(!); bar 38; a rise to high C at bar 38; implied cadences at bars 43-4. The final chord is also built on the note C but is intentionally 'unstable' in conventional terms, but is heard as stable by contrast to the body of the piece. But (horrors!) you'll hear pure C-major scales in bars 46-9; and the final chorale from bar 50. Even at the opening, the violins highlight the high notes e'' and g'' in bars 12 and 17... all very conventional stuff if subjected to the scrutiny of Shenkerian analysis).
m
Post-script: Because my piece was written specifically for computer-generated performance, I allowed myself to take the liberty of writing the double-bass part right down to low C below the bass clef. This enabled the double-bass to, as it were, creep slowly out of the Creation Swamp at the start, then crawl back quietly into it at the end. Why? Cuz I enjoy the noise it makes on the computer - I don't care too much that real double-basses can't play down that far... (yet).
 Pierre Gorgon-Symes:
Sometimes I sits and thinks. Sometimes I just sits.

A composer is probably working hardest when staring blankly out a window.